With Good Intentions: U.S. Foreign Policy and Humanitarian Intervention 03.14.06
February 28, 2006
On Tuesday, March 14th, the Cato Institute hosted a policy forum exploring U.S. foreign policy and humanitarian intervention featuring David Rieff, New York Institute for the Humanities at New York University, Contributing Writer, New York Times Magazine; Charles Kupchan, Senior Fellow, Council on Foreign Relations, Professor of International Relations, Georgetown University; Nikolas Gvosdev, Editor, The National Interest; and Christopher Preble, Director of Foreign Policy Studies, Cato Institute, and a founding member of the Coalition for a Realistic Foreign Policy.
Many conservatives questioned the wisdom and efficacy of using the U.S. military for humanitarian missions in Somalia in 1993 and Haiti in 1994. More recently, however, voices on both the left and the right have called for U.S. military intervention in Darfur, Congo, and elsewhere.
What should trigger U.S. military intervention? Some observers advocate an expansive definition of the national interest to include consideration of America's moral obligations. Those who favor a more constrained view of American interests worry that so-called moral missions carry high and frequently overlooked costs, and could therefore distract us from the business of defending America. Should policymakers focus their attention solely on U.S. security, or is the United States obligated to prevent genocide, ethnic cleansing, or wholesale violations of human rights?
The panelists explored these and other questions in an attempt to frame the debate over the proper role of U.S. power in the world today.
The event begins at Noon, on Tuesday, March 14, 2006.
To learn more, visit the Cato web site:
Posted by coalition at February 28, 2006 11:46 AM
<< We Can Live with a Nuclear Iran | Main | The Wrong Way to Fix Iran >>